Fairness and Redistribution: Reply

Item Type Journal paper
Abstract

This paper responds to the comment of Di Tella and Dubra (2013). We first clarify that the model of Alesina and Angeletos (2005) admits two distinct types of multiplicity: one that is at the core of their contribution, and a separate one that is at work in Di Tella and Dubra's example. We then proceed to show how Alesina and Angeletos's results are robust to alternative specifications of the voting mechanism.

Authors Cozzi, Guido; Alesina, Alberto & Angeletos, George-Marios
Journal or Publication Title American Economic Review
Language English
Subjects economics
HSG Classification contribution to scientific community
HSG Profile Area SEPS - Economic Policy
Refereed Yes
Date February 2013
Publisher AEA American Economic Association
Place of Publication Nashville
Volume 103
Number 1
Page Range 554-561
Number of Pages 8
ISSN 0002-8282
ISSN-Digital 1944-7981
Publisher DOI 10.1257/aer.103.1.554
Depositing User Prof. PhD Guido Cozzi
Date Deposited 11 Apr 2013 17:00
Last Modified 23 Aug 2016 11:16
URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/222046

Download

Full text not available from this repository.

Citation

Cozzi, Guido; Alesina, Alberto & Angeletos, George-Marios (2013) Fairness and Redistribution: Reply. American Economic Review, 103 (1). 554-561. ISSN 0002-8282

Statistics

https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/id/eprint/222046
Edit item Edit item
Feedback?