Fairness and Redistribution: Reply
| Item Type | Journal paper |
| Abstract | This paper responds to the comment of Di Tella and Dubra (2013). We first clarify that the model of Alesina and Angeletos (2005) admits two distinct types of multiplicity: one that is at the core of their contribution, and a separate one that is at work in Di Tella and Dubra's example. We then proceed to show how Alesina and Angeletos's results are robust to alternative specifications of the voting mechanism. |
| Authors | Cozzi, Guido; Alesina, Alberto & Angeletos, George-Marios |
| Journal or Publication Title | American Economic Review |
| Language | English |
| Subjects | economics |
| HSG Classification | contribution to scientific community |
| HSG Profile Area | SEPS - Economic Policy |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Date | February 2013 |
| Publisher | AEA American Economic Association |
| Place of Publication | Nashville |
| Volume | 103 |
| Number | 1 |
| Page Range | 554-561 |
| Number of Pages | 8 |
| ISSN | 0002-8282 |
| ISSN-Digital | 1944-7981 |
| Publisher DOI | 10.1257/aer.103.1.554 |
| Depositing User | Prof. PhD Guido Cozzi |
| Date Deposited | 11 Apr 2013 17:00 |
| Last Modified | 23 Aug 2016 11:16 |
| URI: | https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/222046 |
DownloadFull text not available from this repository.CitationCozzi, Guido; Alesina, Alberto & Angeletos, George-Marios (2013) Fairness and Redistribution: Reply. American Economic Review, 103 (1). 554-561. ISSN 0002-8282 Statisticshttps://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/id/eprint/222046
|
