Sophisticated vs. Simple Systemic Risk Measures

Item Type Monograph (Working Paper)
Abstract

This paper evaluates whether sophisticated or simple systemic risk measures are more suitable in identifying which institutions contribute to systemic risk. In this investigation, DCoVaR, Marginal Expected Shortfall (MES), SRISK and Granger-Causality Networks are considered as sophisticated systemic risk measures. Market capitalization, total debt, leverage, the stock market returns of an institution, and the correlation between the stock market returns of an institution and the market, are considered as simple systemic risk measures. Systemic relevance is approximated by the receipt of financial support during the financial crisis and the classification, as a systemically important institution, by national or international regulators. The analyses are performed for all companies included in the S&P 500 composite index. The findings suggest that simple systemic risk measures have more explanatory power than sophisticated risk measures. In particular, total debt is found to be the most suitable indicator to detect institutions which contribute to systemic risk, according to the explanatory power and model fit. The most suitable sophisticated risk measure seems to be SRISK.

Authors Pankoke, David Antonius
Language English
Keywords Systemic Risk, DCoVaR, Marginal Expected Shortfall, SRISK, Granger-Causality Networks
Subjects business studies
HSG Classification contribution to scientific community
Refereed No
Date 2014
Series Name WORKING PAPERS ON FINANCE
Number 2014/22
Depositing User David Antonius Pankoke
Date Deposited 13 Jan 2015 10:37
Last Modified 30 Jan 2015 12:52
URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/238470

Download

[img]
Preview
Text
14_22_Pankoke_Sophisticated vs Simple Systemic Risk Mearurement.pdf

Download (344kB) | Preview

Citation

Pankoke, David Antonius: Sophisticated vs. Simple Systemic Risk Measures. WORKING PAPERS ON FINANCE, 2014, 2014/22.

Statistics

https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/id/eprint/238470
Edit item Edit item
Feedback?