| Item Type |
Journal paper
|
| Abstract |
Critical Infrastructure (CI) provision is characterized by privatization of CI providers, transnational risks and a changing role of the state. We describe two paradigmatic systems of state liability with a view to CI liability, namely Germany as a fault system and Switzerland as a strict liability system. Both are unsatisfactory and not well adapted to the modern realities and exigencies of allocation of risks and liability in CI and show flaws from a functional, incentive-based perspective. Therefore, we make suggestions how those systems may be ameliorated, suggesting organizational, design and supervisory liability reforms. |
| Authors |
van Aaken, Anne & Wildhaber, Isabelle |
| Journal or Publication Title |
European Journal of Risk Regulation : EJRR |
| Language |
German |
| Subjects |
law |
| HSG Classification |
contribution to scientific community |
| Refereed |
Yes |
| Date |
10 September 2015 |
| Publisher |
Lexxion-Verl. |
| Place of Publication |
Berlin |
| Volume |
6 |
| Number |
2 |
| Page Range |
244-254 |
| Number of Pages |
11 |
| ISSN |
1867-299X |
| Depositing User |
Prof. Dr. Isabelle Wildhaber
|
| Date Deposited |
10 Sep 2015 09:31 |
| Last Modified |
20 Jul 2022 17:25 |
| URI: |
https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/243814 |
State Liability and Critical Infastructure: A Comparative and Functional Analysis
![[img]](http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/style/images/fileicons/oa_orange.png)
