Does the Order and Timing of Active Labor Market Programs Matter?

Item Type Monograph (Discussion Paper)
Abstract

This paper extends the traditional focus of active labor market policy evaluation from a static comparison of participation in a program versus nonparticipation (or participation in another program) to the evaluation of the effects of program sequences, i.e. multiple participation or timing of such programs. We use a dynamic evaluation framework that explicitly allows for dynamic selection into different stages of such sequences based on past intermediate outcomes to analyse multiple programs, the timing of programs, or the order of program. Such a demanding analysis is made possible by having available exceptionally comprehensive data of the Austrian workforce population. Our findings suggest that (i) active job search programs are more effective after a qualification program compared to the reverse order, that (ii) multiple participation in qualification measures dominates single participation, and that (iii) the effectiveness of specific labor market programs deteriorates the later they start.

Authors Lechner, Michael & Wiehler, Stephan
Language English
Subjects economics
HSG Classification contribution to scientific community
Refereed No
Date 24 September 2007
Depositing User Prof. Dr. Michael Lechner
Date Deposited 24 Sep 2007 16:19
Last Modified 05 Apr 2020 00:20
URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/publications/40296

Download

[img]
Preview
Text
OBES_IA_final.pdf

Download (115kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
LWi_dynamic_20070928.pdf

Download (245kB) | Preview

Citation

Lechner, Michael & Wiehler, Stephan: Does the Order and Timing of Active Labor Market Programs Matter? 2007,

Statistics

https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/id/eprint/40296
Edit item Edit item
Feedback?