Von der internationalen Politik zum globalen Regieren: Der Wandel der Governance-Norm
Type
fundamental research project
Start Date
01 October 2010
End Date
30 September 2015
URI
Status
ongoing
Keywords
international
Politik
Normen
Internationale Organisationen
Description
Die Projektmitarbeiter/innen untersuchen, inwieweit sich nach der historischen Zäsur von 1990 neue Standards legitimen Regierens jenseits des Staates herausgebildet haben.
Leader contributor(s)
Member contributor(s)
Funder(s)
Topic(s)
international
Politik
Normen
Internationale Organisationen
Method(s)
qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
Range
Institute/School
Range (De)
Institut/School
Division(s)
Eprints ID
235425

Filters

Reset filters

Settings
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

International Organizations under Pressure

2017-09-14 , Dingwerth, Klaus

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Democracy Is Democracy Is Democracy? Changes in Evaluations of International Institutions in Academic Textbooks, 1970-2010

2015-05 , Dingwerth, Klaus , Lehmann, Ina , Reichel, Ellen , Weise, Tobias

This article examines what democracy means when it is used in academic textbook evaluations of international institutions and how the meaning of the term "democracy" in such evaluations has changed over time. An analysis of 71 textbooks on international institutions in the policy areas of international security, environmental, and human rights politics leads us to several answers. We observe slight changes in relation to three aspects. First, the range of democracy-relevant actors expands over time, most notably in relation to nonstate actors as important participants in (or even subjects of) international policymaking. Second, representational concerns become more relevant in justifying demands for greater participation in international institutions. Third, international organizations are increasingly discussed not only as subjects that enhance the transparency and accountability of the policies of their member states, but also as the objects of democratic demands for transparency and accountability themselves.

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Episodic, Unstable, Nominal? The Rise (and Fall) of Democratic Legitimation in International and Transnational Rule-Making

2017-09-14 , Dingwerth, Klaus

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Many Pipers, Many Tunes? Die Legitimationskommunikation internationaler Organisationen in komplexen Umwelten

2015-05-08 , Dingwerth, Klaus , Lehmann, Ina , Reichel, Ellen , Weise, Tobias , Witt, Antonia

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Global democracy and the democratic minimum: Why a procedural account alone is insufficient

2014-12-01 , Dingwerth, Klaus

In this critical comment on the global democracy debate, I take stock of contemporary proposals for democratizing global governance. In the first part of the article, I show that, empirically, many international institutions are now evaluated in terms of their democratic credentials. At the same time, the notions of democracy that underpin such evaluations are often very formalistic. They focus on granting access to civil society organizations, making policy-relevant documents available online or establishing global parliamentary assemblies to give citizens a voice in the decision-making of international organizations. In the second part, I challenge this focus on formal procedures and argue that a normatively persuasive conception of global democracy would shift our focus to areas such as health, education and subsistence. Contrary to much contemporary thinking about global democracy, I thus defend the view that the institutions we have are sufficiently democratic. What is needed are not better procedures, but investments that help the weaker members of global society to make effective use of the democracy-relevant institutions that exist in contemporary international politics.

View