Jamie Gloor
Thumbnail Image
Title
Prof. PhD
Last Name
Gloor
First name
Jamie
Email
jamie.gloor@unisg.ch
ORCID

Filters

4 1
Reset filters

Settings
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Publication
    Incorporating study pre-registration into your work? Registered Research: A panel discussion
    Gardner, William (Bill)
    ;
    Rink, Floor
    ;
    Schyns, Birgit
    ;
    Gloor, Jamie orcid-logo
    ;
    Clapp-Smith, Rachel
    ;
    Hammond, Michelle
    ;
    Lester, Gretchen
    This Professional Development Workshop (PDW) is intended for those interested in registered research, either from the author or editor perspective. In the spirit of Creating a Better World Together, by creating better research together, five panelists will represent various approaches to the registered research process, including those who have published registered research articles, those who have edited registered research special issues, and editors who have embraced this process. Each panelist will discuss the requirements for a successful registered research manuscript, which he or she has learned in a career as author, reviewer, or editor. In addition, each panelist will share thoughts regarding the analysis of the process, including any specific changes to one’s past research process, and recommendations for how authors should approach this process in the future. Each panelist will detail necessary action steps, including requirements for reviewers for these journals. After the panelists conclude their remarks, attendees will break into smaller roundtable groups, ordered by topical area and research interest. The session will conclude a debriefing, where each roundtable group will share their experiences and best practices for those choosing registered research. Our goal is to help make the registered research process available and more effective for those in the field by enhancing rigor, relevance, and creating better relationships throughout the publication process. PDW organized by Gretchen Lester (SJSU) and Michelle Hammond (Oakland). Jamie Gloor was a panelist alongside Willian J. Gardner (Texas Tech and LQ AE), Floor Rink (Groningen and AMJ AE), Birgit Schyns (NEOMA and author of pre-registered research at LQ), and Rachel Clapp-Smith (Purdue, Editor for LQ's special issue on pre-registered research)
    Type: conference contribution
    URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/116979
  • Publication
    Missed, Dissed, or Dismissed…then Assist? How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment
    (Purdue University, )
    Gloor, Jamie orcid-logo
    ;
    Okimoto, Tyler
    ;
    Li, Xinxin
    ;
    Gazdag, Brooke
    ;
    Ryan, Michelle
    Integrating a social identity approach with selective incivility theory, we examine how identification—with an organization, with one’s gender, and as a feminist—shapes how bystanders interpret and respond to incivility (i.e., interpersonal acts of disrespect) and selective incivility (i.e., incivility motivated by targets’ social group membership) towards women at work. We propose that bystanders with stronger organizational identification are less likely to perceive incivility towards female colleagues as discrimination, and thus, less likely to intervene, but female bystanders with stronger gender identification are more likely to do so. Using two-wave field data in a cross-lagged panel design (Study 1, N = 336), results showed that organizational identification negatively predicted observed selective incivility one year later; we found no evidence of an impact of female bystanders’ gender identification. We replicated and extended these results with a vignette experiment (Study 2, N = 410) and an experimental recall study (Study 3, N = 504). Findings revealed a “dark side” of organizational identification such that strongly identified bystanders were less likely to recognize incivility as discrimination, but there were again no effects of women’s gender identification; Study 3 also showed that bystander feminist identification increased perceived discrimination and intervention. These results raise doubts that women are more sensitive to (i.e., feel particularly “dissed” by) women’s mistreatment, however, more strongly identified men and women feminists are more dissed and likely to assist (i.e., intervene). Although more strongly organizationally identified employees may “dismiss” women’s mistreatment, they also assist once it is perceived as discriminatory.
    Type: conference contribution
    Journal: Dismantling Bias Conference
    URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/116938
  • Publication
    That’s a (Science) Riot! Cultivating Research Impact through Stand-up Comedy
    Otner, Sarah
    ;
    Cockburn, Bethany
    ;
    Gloor, Jamie orcid-logo
    Research impact is girded by a solid foundation of effective Knowledge Exchange -- i.e., a two-way flow between researchers and end-users of ideas, research evidence, experiences, and skills. However, many of the "best" researchers deploy few strategies beyond teaching, websites, and social media; even fewer can confidently capture public engagement and evaluate its impact. This Professional Development Workshop (PDW) will explore the benefits of humor at work and exploit comedy as a tool of connection to build individual scholars' capacities for science communication and research impact. Participants will receive expert media training in writing and performing comedic delivery of research insights, culminating in a live comedy show!
    Type: conference contribution
    URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/116977
  • Publication
    How to be harassment-free: Expert insights and an allyship (micro)training
    ( 2024-08)
    Huong Pham orcid-logo
    ;
    Jamie Gloor orcid-logo
    ;
    Jenny Hoobler
    ;
    Brent Lyons
    ;
    Shannon Rawski
    ;
    Jennifer Berdahl
    ;
    Lilia Cortina
    This Professional Development Workshop (PDW) is intended for those who are interested in actively co-creating more respectful, harassment-free work and conference environments. In the spirit of Innovating for the Future, we integrate the newest evidence and interventions (e.g., allyship) in the harassment space to co-create better cultures for our cohorts of today and tomorrow. Our five expert panelists will present various evidence and approaches to stemming harassment and includes those who have published research on the topic and those who have been involved with the topic from a more practical perspective. Each panelist will discuss (sexual) harassment, what they have learned in their research and careers as academics, conference goers, group leaders, bystanders, and/or ethics representatives. Together, we will explore potentially overlooked examples (i.e., what constitutes harassment) and how to be an effective ally (e.g., when we have more privilege). Attendees will have a chance to ask questions, after which they will break out into small, facilitated groups for discussion, reflection, and practice application. Our goal is to help craft more respectful work and conference experiences by raising awareness of the often subtle and ambiguous examples of harassment, practicing how we can all play a role as active allies, and co-creating higher-quality organizational and academy experiences. In this way, we innovate together with cutting-edge insights and more effective action towards a harassment-free future.
    Type: conference contribution
    URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/120684
  • Publication
    We “demand” to know: is AI really everywhere (in management research)?
    ( 2024-09)
    Jamie Gloor orcid-logo
    ;
    Ivo Blohm orcid-logo
    ;
    Emanuel de Bellis
    ;
    Tobias Ebert
    ;
    Naomi Haefner orcid-logo
    ;
    Johannes Schöning orcid-logo
    ;
    Charlotta Siren
    ;
    Clemens Stachl orcid-logo
    ;
    Katja Einola
    Research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its use has proliferated (Patra et al., 2024), matching the pace of technological advances in the field of AI and its presence in business. For example, since the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, CEO and CFO mentions of “AI” in earnings calls have skyrocketed from 500 to 30,000+ (Estrada, 2024). While it is encouraging that scholars and top leaders are rising to the occasion and rallying around such an important topic, this rapid, recent, and far-reaching interest in AI across research and practice is also affecting ostensibly unrelated research fields. That is, the hype around AI might have profound, unintended effects on aspects of research that we have not yet considered. In this discussion piece, we theorize and empirically explore AI demand effects (i.e., the tendency for participants to think that a study is about AI and therefore alter their behaviors). We need to understand these AI demand effects, because they might broadly influence our scientific evidence and interpretations of research related to AI–and beyond.
    Type: conference contribution
    URI: https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/120681