Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Publication
    Predecessor CEO retention as board chair in family and nonfamily firms
    (Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019-08) ;
    We challenge the negative view that predecessor retention – the appointment of outgoing CEOs as board chairs – deteriorates post-succession firm performance. We posit that predecessor retention improves post-succession performance in family firms since predecessors are more likely to act as mentors to their successors whereas their counterparts in nonfamily firms tend to behave opportunistically. Exploring variance among family firms, we suggest that successor mentoring is most valuable under a heightened ability of the predecessor to mentor and a pronounced need of the successor for mentoring. Probing a matched sample of 305 CEO successions in S&P1500 firms between 2001 and 2013, our results complement CEO succession research by introducing a CEO mentoring perspective and by differentiating between family and nonfamily firms.
  • Publication
    Selling what you love : Divestiture activity in family-controlled firms
    (Academy of Management, 2013-08-09) ;
    Based on agency theory, prior studies in divestiture literature argued and found that blockholder ownership functions as a catalyst of divestiture activity. This reasoning, however, assumes that all types of blockholders are primarily interested in utilizing their power to optimize the economic benefits of their ownership stakes. Drawing on socioemotional wealth perspective, the present study challenges this assumption for the case of family block ownership. As a baseline, we propose that family block ownership decreases the likelihood of divestiture occurrence since divestitures pose severe threats to family owners’ socioemotional benefits. Further, we analyze under which conditions financial wealth considerations outweigh socioemotional wealth considerations. Counter to our theoretical prediction, our empirical findings indicate that financial performance is not a sufficiently strong contingency factor which helps overcome the greater reluctance of family-controlled firms to engage in divestiture. Instead, our results suggest that to offset this greater reluctance financial wealth concerns need to pair with institutional legitimacy concerns in order to increase the likelihood of divestiture by family-controlled firms. Our study thus extends agency theory and contributes to both family and divestiture literatures.
  • Publication
    Intangible resources and family firm performance: the moderating role family involvement in strategy making
    ( 2008-06-30)
    Naldi, Lucia
    ;
    Nordqvist, Mattias
    ;
    According to the RBV, intangible resources might be sources of sustainable competitive advantage because they are ingrained in the unique interaction between the family and its firm and inherently difficult to imitate by competitors. In this paper we set out to examine how two important intangible resources in the family business context, knowledge-based and reputational resources are linked to performance. In line with RBV literature proposing that resources alone do not confer a competitive advantage (Collis, 1995) we propose a contingency perspective for family involvement in strategy making. Indeed, we empirically show that the link between intangible resources and firm performance is moderated by family involvement in strategy making. The paper sheds new light on both the direct effects of reputational and knowledge-based resources on firm performance in family firms, and on the potential benefits and drawbacks of family involvement in continuous and disruptive strategy making on the efficiency of resource usage.