Choosing the rules: Preferences over voting systems for assemblies of representatives
Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
ISSN
0167-2681
Type
journal article
Date Issued
2020-06-01
Author(s)
Abstract
There are many situations where different groups make collective decisions by voting in an assembly or committee in which each group is represented by a single person. There is a great deal of theoretical, normative literature on the question of what voting system such an assembly should use, but a consensus is lacking. Instead of studying theoretical concepts on the design of voting systems, I ask which voting systems individuals actually prefer. This is important for the legitimacy and acceptance of voting institutions. To answer this question, I design a laboratory experiment in which participants choose voting systems for assemblies when they do not know which group they will be in (and, as a control, when they do know it). Behind the veil of ignorance, participants predominantly choose voting systems that allocate more voting power to larger groups than the most prominent theoretical concept suggests. In front of the veil of ignorance, participants predominantly choose voting systems favoring their own group.
Language
English
Keywords
Committee voting
Assembly of representatives
Penrose's
Square Root Rule
Banzhaf power
Shapley–Shubik power
Optimal apportionment
Refereed
Yes
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
174
Start page
420
End page
434
Pages
15
Subject(s)
Contact Email Address
matthias.weber@unisg.ch
Eprints ID
260553
File(s)
Loading...
open.access
Name
Weber JEBO accepted manuscript with online appendix.pdf
Size
1.77 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
61691667acbd59af231de51a6c13b433