Alizadeh Afrouzi, OmidOmidAlizadeh Afrouzi2023-04-132023-04-132020-10-04https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/111701https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320961660This study analyzes the journalistic discourses on social media in order to find out the position of Venezuelan and international press in the coverage of 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Drawing on Borrat’s and Enguix Oliver’s theoretical approaches regarding newspapers and social networks, and through CDA models of Fairclough and Richardson, this research aims to understand to what extent the national quality newspapers such as El Nacional, El Universal, and Últimas Noticias, and the international ones as The New York Times, The Guardian, El País, and Le Monde participated in the Venezuelan political conflict and constructed the respective political narratives through Instagram. The findings show that both national and international press participated as external narrators in the political conflict and highlight the role of newspapers as political actors and social media as a tool in their hands.encritical discourse analysisdiscursive strategiesEl NacionalEl PaísEl Universaljournalistic discourseJuan GuaidóInstagramLe Mondenews in the pressNicolás Maduropolitical actorsocial mediatextual analysisThe GuardianThe New York TimesÚltimas NoticiasVenezuelaSocial media and journalistic discourse analysis: 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisisjournal article