Perceptions of Justice and the Human Rights Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework
Journal
Journal of business ethics : JOBE
ISSN
0167-4544
Type
journal article
Date Issued
2013-08-06
Author(s)
Murphy, Matthew
Abstract
Human rights declarations are instruments used to introduce universal standards of ethics. The UN’s Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework (Ruggie, Protect, respect, and remedy: A Framework for business and human
rights. UN Doc A/HRC/8/5, 2008; Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘‘Protect, Respect, and Remedy’’ framework. UN Doc A/HRC/17/31, 2011) intends to provide guidance for
corporate behavior in regard to human rights. This article applies concepts from the field of organizational justice to the arena of business and human rights for the purpose of operationalizing the UN Framework. This approach facilitates the recognition of gaps between perceptions of justice held by stakeholders versus businesses and/or the State. Such recognition raises the potential for addressing issues that lead to divergent perceptions of justice, thus
potentially improving the human rights performance of businesses. The research also shows the potential for complicity of businesses in human rights abuses and exposes a fundamental weakness in the UN Framework, which attempts to draw a sharp distinction between duties of States versus responsibilities of business. We illustrate this approach through analysis of the case of Goldcorp’s Marlin Mine in Guatemala; an extractive industry project
that affects indigenous communities.
rights. UN Doc A/HRC/8/5, 2008; Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘‘Protect, Respect, and Remedy’’ framework. UN Doc A/HRC/17/31, 2011) intends to provide guidance for
corporate behavior in regard to human rights. This article applies concepts from the field of organizational justice to the arena of business and human rights for the purpose of operationalizing the UN Framework. This approach facilitates the recognition of gaps between perceptions of justice held by stakeholders versus businesses and/or the State. Such recognition raises the potential for addressing issues that lead to divergent perceptions of justice, thus
potentially improving the human rights performance of businesses. The research also shows the potential for complicity of businesses in human rights abuses and exposes a fundamental weakness in the UN Framework, which attempts to draw a sharp distinction between duties of States versus responsibilities of business. We illustrate this approach through analysis of the case of Goldcorp’s Marlin Mine in Guatemala; an extractive industry project
that affects indigenous communities.
Language
English
Keywords
Human rights Organizational justice
Indigenous peoples Extractive industry
Stakeholder relationships
Indigenous peoples Extractive industry
Stakeholder relationships
HSG Classification
contribution to scientific community
HSG Profile Area
SHSS - Kulturen, Institutionen, Maerkte (KIM)
Refereed
Yes
Publisher
Springer
Volume
116
Start page
781
End page
797
Subject(s)
Division(s)
Eprints ID
258962