Publication:
Facial recognition technology in law enforcement: Regulating data analysis of another kind

cris.lastimport.scopus2025-08-12T01:07:02Z
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.department#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0002-2644-8116
cris.virtual.orcid0000-0002-8868-5889
cris.virtualsource.departmentc2124e4d-ff68-4f6e-bca9-6a44a41e08ab
cris.virtualsource.department450bd970-2471-4b15-9360-9ebbeaa30f05
cris.virtualsource.orcidc2124e4d-ff68-4f6e-bca9-6a44a41e08ab
cris.virtualsource.orcid450bd970-2471-4b15-9360-9ebbeaa30f05
dc.contributor.authorMonika Simmler
dc.contributor.authorGiulia Canova
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-01T18:25:32Z
dc.date.available2024-12-01T18:25:32Z
dc.date.issued2025-04
dc.description.abstractFacial recognition technology (FRT) has emerged as a powerful tool for law enforcement, enabling the automated identification of individuals based on their unique facial features. Authorities have more and more made use of the technology to enhance criminal investigations through the analysis of images and video footage. In view of its increased use in Europe, this paper explores the legal implications of FRT in law enforcement under EU law and evaluates approaches to regulation. FRT use constitutes biometric data processing and comes with a particularly sensitive analysis of data. Its specific nature is grounded in the creation of a new (biometric) quality of data in order to subsequently compare for matches. Due to its impact on fundamental rights, this approach differs from conventional forensic analyses and must be appropriately regulated. Such regulation should consider the multiple data processing steps and reflect each step's impact on fundamental rights. From this procedural stance, the shortcomings of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) become evident. The AI Act contains specific rules for biometric AI systems but does not provide the necessary legal bases to justify FRT use by law enforcement. Without a comprehensive legal framework, such use is not permitted. This article provides concrete guidelines for addressing such regulation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106092
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/handle/20.500.14171/121437
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Law & Security Review
dc.relation.issn0267-3649
dc.titleFacial recognition technology in law enforcement: Regulating data analysis of another kind
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.volume56
oairecerif.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106092

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0267364924001572-main.pdf
Size:
630.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
875 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections