Rethinking Crowdsourcing
Journal
Harvard business review : HBR
ISSN
0017-8012
Type
journal article
Date Issued
2017-11-21
Author(s)
Abstract
When the Swiss soft drink company Rivella was looking to launch new flavors in 2012, it used an open innovation platform to ask consumers for ideas and received 800 responses. As managers sorted through them, they noticed that one in particular—for a health-oriented ginger-flavored drink—appeared to be extremely popular. But on closer examination they saw that much of the buzz around it was coming from just a handful of participants who were working feverishly to elicit votes and comments. “It was a very small group of consumers who were rallying one another and generating a lot of noise,” says Silvan Brauen, who oversaw Rivella’s innovation pipeline. Despite the strong online feedback, the company concluded that the ginger flavor would flop in the market and abandoned the idea.
Language
English
Refereed
No
Publisher
Harvard Business School Publ.
Publisher place
Boston, Mass.
Number
November-December
Start page
19
End page
22
Official URL
Subject(s)
Eprints ID
252440
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
open.access
Name
Crowdsourcing Isn’t as Unbiased as You Might Think.pdf
Size
1.96 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
bdd8db69711a73ad94f96566bc05b896