Anna Jasinenko
Title
Prof. Dr.
Last Name
Jasinenko
First name
Anna
Email
anna.jasinenko@unisg.ch
ORCID
Phone
+41 71 224 3463
15 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 15
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Mirror Versus Substitute: How Institutional Context Affects Individual Motivation for Corporate Social ResponsibilityThe institutional perspective on corporate social responsibility (CSR) has discussed two diametrically opposed hypotheses about how institutional context influences CSR. Whereas the mirror hypothesis suggests that CSR is stronger in institutional contexts with stringent CSR-related regulations, the substitute hypothesis posits that CSR is stronger in weakly regulated contexts. Drawing on the micro-CSR literature, we propose that examining individual CSR motivation can help to better understand the effect of institutional context on CSR because it makes focusing on substantively motivated CSR possible, and it can shed light on the hitherto neglected psychological moderators in this relationship. We conducted three studies, obtaining results indicating that institutional trust is an important moderator of the institutional effect on individual CSR motivation. Overall, we found the highest individual CSR motivation when regulatory stringency and institutional trust were high, supporting the mirror hypothesis. However, in contexts of low institutional trust, this positive effect of a strong institutional context was reduced or even reversed. Our study contributes to the literature on the institutional perspective on CSR, micro-CSR, and institutional theory, and it has important practical implications for CSR management.Type:journal articleJournal:Journal of ManagementScopus© Citations 9 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Justified by ideology: Why conservatives care less about corporate social irresponsibilityType:journal articleJournal:Journal of Business ResearchIssue:114Scopus© Citations 26 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Measuring public value: scale development and construct validationType:journal articleJournal:International Public Management JournalScopus© Citations 58 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Die Gemeinwohl-Bilanz auf dem Prüfstand der Bevölkerung: empirische Überprüfung der demokratischen Legitimation der Gemeinwohl-BilanzType:journal articleJournal:zfwu Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und UnternehmensethikVolume:20/2019Issue:3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Parasite Stress Theory in Business Ethics: Bio-Ecological Influences on Sustainable Practices(2025) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, From words to beliefs: Bridging rhetorical institutionalism and multilevel theory of legitimacy(2025); ; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Perceived Organizational Purpose: Systematic Literature Review, Construct Definition, Measurement and Potential Employee Outcomes(2023-09-01); Josephina Charlotte SteuberOrganizational purpose has recently gained great popularity in research and practice. However, the development of this nascent research field has struggled with definitional ambiguity, the lack of a measurement instrument and little empirical testing of potential outcomes. In our paper, we first introduce and define the multidimensional construct of perceived organizational purpose, which sheds light on the individual and subjective experiences of organizational purpose. Second, building on our construct definition, we develop and validate a four-dimensional Perceived Organizational Purpose Scale. Third, we disentangle the related yet differentiated concepts of perceived organizational purpose and meaningful work and theorize how substantial knowledge in the field of meaningful work can be transferred to the relatively new and untested field of perceived organizational purpose. Fourth, we critically elaborate and empirically test the relationship of perceived organizational purpose with employee job satisfaction, subjective wellbeing and work-life conflict.Type:case review (law)Journal:Journal of Management StudiesVolume:60Issue:6Scopus© Citations 65 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Mirror versus substitute: How the institutional context affects individual motivation for corporate social responsibility(2024-07); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, At a distance, all is well: The intertwining relationship between system justification, psychological distance, and environmental concern(2024); Grubert, ThorbenThe urgency of environmental issues, notably climate change, demands a nuanced understanding of the psychological barriers and enablers of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. Our study delves into the psychological underpinnings of environmental concern, a pivotal gateway to pro-environmental behaviors, focusing on the interplay between system justification theory and construal level theory. We hypothesize that individuals with a strong system justification trait perceive environmental problems to be psychologically distant, which leads to diminished environmental concern. Expanding on this, we anticipate that external threats to the system exacerbate this effect. However, we posit that strategically reducing psychological distance, e.g. through targeted manipulations, can counterbalance this negative effect. We test our hypotheses in three empirical studies: Study 1 shows a strong system justification trait to correlate with a higher psychological distance to environmental problems and lower environmental concern. Study 2 builds on this foundation and demonstrates that experimentally induced threats reinforce the negative effect of a strong system justification trait on environmental concern via psychological distance. Finally, Study 3 showcases that experimentally reducing psychological distance weakens the negative connection between a strong system justification trait and environmental concern. Overall, our research develops a comprehensive framework to explain variations in environmental concern by linking system justification and construal level theory. Importantly, we introduce interventions to reduce the negative effect of a strong system justification trait on environmental concern. Understanding these psychological mechanisms is pivotal for policymakers and communicators seeking effective strategies to bolster environmental attitudes and actions.Type:conference contribution - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, COVID-19’s Effect on Citizens’ Legitimacy Perceptions of Business Regulation(2023);