Benjamin Märkli
Title
Dr.
Last Name
Märkli
First name
Benjamin
Email
benjamin.maerkli@unisg.ch
ORCID
Phone
+41 71 224 2167
24 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 24
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Ehe gegen alle? Zur Öffnung der Ehe ohne VerfassungsänderungType:journal articleJournal:Aktuelle Juristische PraxisVolume:2020Issue:4 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Notrecht in der Anwendungsprobe: Grundlegendes am Beispiel der COVID-19-VerordnungType:journal articleJournal:Sicherheit & RechtVolume:2020Issue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Missbrauch von Krediten nach COVID-19-SolidarbürgschaftsverordnungType:journal articleJournal:Aktuelle Juristische PraxisVolume:2020Issue:6 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Ausschaffungs-Motion: Volltreffer oder Rohrkrepierer?Type:journal articleJournal:Aktuelle Juristische PraxisVolume:2019Issue:5 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Rechtsschutz unter erschwerten Bedingungen – Krisen als Herausforderung für die Dritte Gewalt(Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2022-12-02); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Richterliche Abhängigkeit von sich selbst - Zum Problem der Vorbefassung im Rahmen des einstweiligen Rechtsschutzes(Nomos, 2018-07); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Fremdsprachen im Verwaltungsverfahren des Bundes – Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des EnglischenIn administrative proceedings, the language of the proceedings must be an official language. In practice, however, there is an increasing need to make use of the English language. At the level of the proceedings before the authority of first instance, a final ruling (final decision) may not be issued in English, as it is subject to the requirement that official languages be used. With regard to submissions in English, isolated exceptions exist under special statutory provisions or international law. The same applies to appeal proceedings. De lege ferenda, a relaxation would be advisable: in order to ensure effective legal protection, submissions in English should, as a rule, be admissible; under certain circumstances, even decisions rendered in English may be conceivable. This article argues in favour of a pragmatic, yet rule-of-law-based opening towards foreign languages, one that acknowledges present-day realities.Type:ArticleJournal:ex/anteVolume:2026Issue:01 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Fristwahrung trotz verspätetem Poststempel?(2025-12-30)This article examines the Swiss Federal Supreme Court's decision 6B_1360/2023 which addresses whether a submission is deemed timely when it was handed over to Swiss Post before the deadline despite being processed and postmarked at a later date. The article provides a systematic analysis of the Court's reasoning on the burden and standard of proof, the admissibility of different forms of evidence, and the evidentiary presumption attached to the postmark. Particular emphasis is placed on cases involving postal collection agreements, where operational processes may delay the official registration of mail. The article concludes by outlining the practical implications for legal practitioners and public authorities and offers recommendations on documenting the posting of procedural submissions to ensure that timely filing can be established if subsequently disputed.Type:case review (law)Journal:Reiser + Partner AG - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication,
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »