Roy Gava
Title
Prof. Dr.
Last Name
Gava
First name
Roy
Email
roy.gava@unisg.ch
ORCID
Phone
+41 71 224 7377
24 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 24
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Civil society versus banks: Bottom-up pressure in sustainable financeBanks worldwide are increasingly under the scrutiny of CSOs (Civil Society Organizations). This bottom-up pressure remains overlooked in the rapidly expanding literature on the politics of sustainable finance. With a focus on environmental (mis)conduct, the paper investigates the corporate shaming of banks by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and grassroots groups. The empirical investigation of this outside lobbying is articulated in three questions: (1) What are the environmental issues for which CSOs shame banks? (2) Which CSOs shame banks? and (3) Which banks are shamed by CSOs? Corporate and political opportunity structures are considered in a multivariate analysis to examine how the risk of CSO criticism varies across banks and countries. The empirical exploration covers CSO advocacy against the Top-1000 banks worldwide for the period 2010–2022. The paper relies on data from Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) controversies. This kind of data on corporate reputation is of policy significance but remains underused in political research.Type:journal articleJournal:Competition & ChangeScopus© Citations 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Financial Regulation Debates in Hard Times: A Comparative Analysis of Insider and Outsider Pressure during the Global Financial Crisis(2022); ;Oriol SabatéLaura MoralesThis article analyses the nature of policy debates on financial regulation during the onset of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) by considering three elements that shape them: the salience of the debate, the actors that dominate the debate, and the degree of anti-status quo pressure. Theoretically, it contributes to Culpepper’s quiet/noisy politics framework by clarifying its multidimensionality and explicitly introducing the degree of contestation. Empirically, it focuses on two regulatory issues: (1) the restriction of banking and financial activities and (2) the debate on the remuneration of bankers. The data captures political claims during the first 12 months of the GFC and covers 19 established democracies. The findings indicate that policy debates were unevenly politicized across countries and issues, and that structural factors are not enough to account for the observed variation in pressure for reform for all types of actors, thus constituting a puzzle for further research.Type:journal articleJournal:Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and PracticeVolume:24Issue:2Scopus© Citations 4 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Challenging the regulators: Enforcement and appeals in financial regulationType:journal articleJournal:Regulation & GovernanceScopus© Citations 5 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Business Groups and Advocacy Success: Insights from a Multi‐venue Approach(2020) ;Varone, Frédéric ;Eichenberger, Steven; ;Jourdain, CharlotteMach, AndréType:journal articleJournal:Acta PoliticaScopus© Citations 5 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, How MPs' ties to interest groups matter for legislative co-sponsorship(2019-05) ;Fischer, Manuel ;Varone, Frédéric; Sciarini, PascalType:journal articleJournal:Social NetworksVolume:57Scopus© Citations 31 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, FINMA’s Enforcement in CourtThis article presents an empirical and qualitative analysis of the judicial review of the Swiss Financial Markets Supervisory Authority’s (FINMA) enforcement of financial market laws by the Federal Administrative Court and the Federal Supreme Court. It is part of a broader research project on global enforcement against financial institutions and their managers and employees. Based on an overview of FINMA’s enforcement, the appeal rate against FINMA decisions and the success rate of such complaints is discussed. In addition, the article analyses key areas in which the courts have supported or set limits to FINMA practices. Statements on the right to a fair trial and the scope of FINMA’s discretion are the object of a special analysis. In an overall assessment, the authors come to the conclusion that, despite FINMA’s relatively high success rate in court, there is an effective judicial control over its enforcement.Type:journal articleJournal:Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und FinanzmarktrechtVolume:19Issue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Self-Selection and Misreporting in Legislative Surveys(2018) ;Bundi, Pirmin ;Varone, Frédéric; Widmer, ThomasType:journal articleJournal:Political Science Research and MethodsVolume:6Issue:04 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Policy evaluation in parliament: interest groups as catalysts(2018) ;Varone, Frédéric ;Bundi, PirminType:journal articleJournal:International Review of Administrative Sciences - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Interest groups as multi-venue players(2018) ;Varone, Frédéric; ;Jourdain, Charlotte ;Eichenberger, StevenMach, AndréType:journal articleJournal:Interest Groups & AdvocacyVolume:7Issue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Who Europeanises parliamentary attention, on which issues and how? A policy agenda perspective(2017); ;Sciarini, PascalVarone, FrédéricType:journal articleJournal:The Journal of Legislative StudiesVolume:23Issue:4
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »