Sarah Lilian Stephen
Title
Dr.
Last Name
Stephen
First name
Sarah Lilian
Email
sarah.stephen@unisg.ch
Twitter
https://twitter.com/sarahstephen_?lang=en
18 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 18
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, From paradise lost to paradise regained: A compassionate retuning of assessed seminarsUniversities often aim to deliver a curriculum that is both research‐based and develops transferable skills in students, thereby enhancing their competitiveness in the job market. At the same time, evidence indicates that university students experience significant stress owing to the competitive nature of the assessments, an aspect that is particularly exacerbated in higher educational institutions in liberal market economies. This article presents evidence suggesting that Assessed Seminars, a form of summative assessment, could deliver on the aims of universities whilst curtailing the detrimental effects of stress on students, provided it is underpinned by a compassion‐focussed pedagogy. The empirical study introduces four interventions (viz., communication of expectations and assessment, peer‐assisted learning and compassionate management of group dynamics, toolkits and practice, and detailed feedback) in the Assessed Seminars of a first‐year undergraduate course in Business and Management at a UK university. Results indicate that students engaged with the assessment and were satisfied, and that it led to both subject‐based knowledge and the development of transferable skills. While students recognise psychological responses at the onset, these challenges are overcome and transformed into strengths by the conclusion of the course. Based on the findings, the article presents a best practices protocol for Assessed Seminars that could be implemented by educational institutions.Type:journal articleJournal:British Educational Research Journal - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, In Defense of Capitalism: Modern Slavery Would Be Much Worse Without ItType:journal articleJournal:Business & SocietyScopus© Citations 6 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users(2016-01) ;Santiago-Delefosse, M ;Gavin, A ;Bruchez, C ;Roux, PThe number of qualitative research methods has grown substantially over the last thirty years, both in social sciences and, more recently, in health sciences. This growth came with questions on the quality criteria needed to evaluate this work, and numerous guidelines were published. These guidelines, however, include many discrepancies, both in terms of vocabulary and structure. Many expert evaluators also decry the absence of consensual and reliable evaluation tools. To address this gap, we present the results of an evaluation of 58 existing guidelines in four major health science fields (medicine and epidemiology; nursing and health education; social sciences and public health; psychology/psychiatry, research methods and organization) by expert (n = 16) and peer (n = 40) users (e.g., article reviewers, experts allocating funds, editors). This research was conducted between 2011 and 2014 at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Experts met during three workshops spread over this period. A series of 12 consensual essential criteria, along with definitions, stemmed from a question in a semi-qualitative evaluation questionnaire that we developed. Although there is consensus on the name of the criteria, we highlight limitations on the ability to compare specific definitions of criteria across health science fields. We conclude that each criterion must be explained to come to broader consensus and identify definitions that are easily operational and consensual to all fields examined.Type:journal articleJournal:Social Science and MedicineVolume:148Scopus© Citations 117 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Critères de qualité des recherches qualitatives en sciences de la santé. À propos d’une analyse comparative de huit grilles de critères de qualité en psychiatrie/psychologie et en médecine(2015-06) ;Santiago-Delefosse, M ;Bruchez, C ;Gavin, AIntroduction There is an increasing number of qualitative research in the health sciences. However, such research encounters difficulty in being published and is less recognised by funding agencies and/or reviewers of journals. Given this situation, researchers have developed a set of grids and criteria intended to establish the “standards” of the quality of qualitative research. Objectives The authors of this study performed a comparative analysis of eight grids and the constituent criteria, in order to assess their comparability. Method A review of existing evaluation grids in the health sciences was conducted via the search engines: Web of Science, Science Direct, PsychoInfo, Medline, etc. This established a brief overview of the state of the research. Following this, eight grids from psychology/psychiatry and general medicine, which have been translated into French for the first time, are presented. Finally, the authors provide a descriptive and thematic analysis of the content and structure of these grids. Results The comparison between the grids demonstrates the difficulties in finding an agreement in the definitions of criteria between the various authors. These difficulties evidence the differences between the grids from the point of view of the underlying epistemology and the point of view of the criteria used (number, type, form, content). Discussion The authors show that the differences between the grids reflect the diversity of paradigms implicitly referred to by the authors of the grids, although never explicitly mentioned in their texts. Conclusion The authors conclude that the increase in publications of qualitative research has failed to overcome the difficulties in establishing criteria, both defined and shared, and that the great heterogeneity of concepts raises major problems, not only methodological, but also epistemological and theoretical.Type:journal articleJournal:L'Évolution PsychiatriqueVolume:80Issue:2Scopus© Citations 4 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Diversity of the Quality Criteria in Qualitative Research in the Health Sciences: Lessons from a Lexicometric Analysis Composed of 133 GuidelinesType:journal articleJournal:Forum: Qualitative Social Research - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Complexity of the Paradigms Present in Quality Criteria of Qualitative Research GridsType:journal articleJournal:Sage Open - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Link between Climate Change Risk Perception, Strategy, and Performance: A Risk-Based ApproachWhile many companies engage in both climate mitigation and adaptation strategies, a clear understanding of how risk perceptions shape these strategies and their ultimate effectiveness is lacking. Our research proposes a novel risk-based model of corporate climate change strategy, arguing that companies' perceptions of climate risk determine the type of strategy they pursue, ultimately affecting environmental and financial performance. We theorize three risk-based climate strategies (risk-avoiding, risk-reducing, and risk-transferring) and hypothesize that they mediate the relationship between risk and performance. We use a rich dataset of large panel data and causal mediation analysis to test our hypotheses. We find that more stringent climate strategies mediate the climate change risk-environmental performance relationship more strongly than less stringent strategies. Further, stringent strategies improve short-term financial performance and external carbon exposure evaluations influence long-term financial performance. Our new conceptualization is based on risk and task environment, and integrated with climate mitigation and adaptation.Type:conference paper - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, From Niche Practices to Protoinstitutions: The Evolution of Emergent Practices in Mature Organisational Fields(2016)Type:conference paperJournal:Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, From Niche Practices to Protoinstitutions: The Evolution of Emergent Practices(2017); ;Maas, KVanSandt, CVType:book sectionVolume:28