Aline Maya Tannò
Title
Dr. rer. soc. HSG
Last Name
Tannò
First name
Aline Maya
Email
aline.tanno@unisg.ch
Phone
+41 71 224 2962
9 results
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Rationality Patterns in Export Promotion Organizations(2026-01-03); ; ;Klasen, Andreas ;Casasola, SimonaExport promotion organizations (EPOs) play an essential role in supporting global trade. Amid escalating global trade tensions, rising tariffs, and increased multipolarity, specialized teams within EPOs assume decision-making functions guided by distinct rationalities. The aim of this research was to identify the different rationalities within EPOs and determine the factors contributing to their variations. Using a mixed method approach, we assessed the rationalities of these teams and show demonstrable differences. Key influencing factors are primarily rooted in the organizational context: institutional guidelines, perceived trends and challenges, and organizational goals. Our analysis reveals three different clusters reflecting differences between corporateoriented, government-oriented, and independent rationality. Understanding these distinct rationalities provides valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking to enhance organizational effectiveness in navigating contemporary global trade challenges.Type:journal articleJournal:Global PolicyVolume:0 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The six dimensions of organizational rationality(Elsevier BV, 2024-12); ; ;Burkhardt, Franca ;Shevkova, OlenaRationalities shape the way individuals interpret information and engage within organizations. Differences in rationality can complicate collaboration. Therefore, comprehending its influence in organizations is crucial. The traditional approach to examining rationalities and their differences is qualitative, with very few studies using quantitative methods. To bridge this gap, we developed a questionnaire to measure organizational rationality across six dimensions: economic, creative, political, social, legal, and technical. This approach allowed us to identify variations in rationality within teams while embracing the complexity prevalent in pluralistic organizations. Our quantitative tool that measures rationalities in organizations can aid scholars and practitioners in gaining insights on influential dimensions and implementing reforms aligned to them.Type:journal articleJournal:SSRN Electronic JournalVolume:2024 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, US-Insights to professionalize Higher Education FundraisingType:journal articleJournal:Internationalisation of Higher EducationVolume:3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Creative rationality in the work of managers - A framework(2024); Creativity in organizations is a social phenomenon rather than an individual one, significantly impacting managers. To enable their organization to work creatively, managers must rationalize creativity in collaboration with peers, employees, and other stakeholders. For creative performance to be recognized as rational, it must align with the organization's purpose. Although various research disciplines have examined these processes, no model exists for creative rationality in organizations. Based on research on creativity, social distance, and rationality, we propose a framework for creative and rational work by managers in organizations.Type:conference paper - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Zwischen dem Ähnlichsten gerade lügt der Schein am schönsten - Wahrnehmungsproblematiken zwischen Faculty und Fundraising von öffentlichen WirtschaftsuniversitätenThis dissertation addresses the question to what extent the mutual perception of the similar communities of meaning 'faculty' and 'fundraisers' at public business universities affects their ability to collaborate. It investigates this using the approach of multirational management on the basis of three case studies at universities from the CEMS network. In doing so, it identifies a total of six areas of tension, three of which are closely related to the respective perceptions of communities of meaning. This dissertation makes three contributions to theory. First, it shows that the similarity of rationalities can also have conflictive effects on actors. Second, using a structured sorting of keywords, it develops a method for operationalizing and measuring rationality differences. Third, it complements rationality research with the perspective of perceptions of communities of meaning.Type:doctoral thesis - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication,