Judith Ströhle
Title
Prof. Dr.
Last Name
Ströhle
First name
Judith
Email
judith.stroehle@unisg.ch
ORCID
Phone
+41 71 224 7197
31 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 31
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Impact Entrepreneurship: Reimagining Entrepreneurial Purpose and Research for Driving Societal Impact(Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-09-18)Scopus© Citations 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Die ESG-Wesentlichkeitsmatrix: Wie ist die Korrelation der Achsen zu interpretieren?Die ESG-Wesentlichkeitsmatrix bleibt ein wichtiges Werkzeug für Schweizer Unternehmen, um die Ergebnisse ihrer Wesentlichkeitsanalysen darzustellen. Ein Vergleich der Berichterstattung zeigt, dass die Matrizen unterschiedliche Muster in den Achsenkorrelationen aufweisen. Dieser Artikel liefert praktische Ansätze zur Analyse und Interpretation dieser Korrelationen.Type:journal articleJournal:Expert FocusIssue:April 2025 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, A Critical Examination of Corporate Environmental and Social Impact Measurement and Valuation(2025-04-15); Scopus© Citations 13 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Monetary impact valuation for sustainable business(2025-09-18); Scopus© Citations 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Principles for impact investments: practical guidance for impact measurement, assessment and valuation(Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-04-18)Scopus© Citations 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Self-Regulation for Reputation-Sensitive Buyers: SA8000 in China(2024-11); Duanyi YangIndustries and firms have diverse motives for adopting self-regulatory institutions. This research develops and tests propositions about one motive—exploiting opportunities to do business with reputation-sensitive buyers—as distinct from self-regulation to defend against regulatory or activist threats. To study the adoption and effects of self-regulation for reputation-sensitive buyers, we study the SA8000 socially responsible employment certification among large firms in China in the early 2000s. Using official longitudinal industrial microdata, we test hypotheses generated by this assumed motive for self-regulation and find that: (a) despite concerns about the corruptibility of certification bodies, SA8000-adopters in China exhibited higher pre-certification worker wages than comparable non-adopters, (b) self-regulation led to increased employment and sales to foreign markets, where reputation-sensitive buyers are concentrated, (c) the positive effect on exports was greater than the (insignificant, negatively signed) effect on domestic sales, and (d) there is no evidence that self-regulation increased worker wages beyond the initial high start. Contrasting these findings with prior research on industry self-regulation for other motives, this study highlights how both adoption patterns and downstream effects differ according to the audience for self-regulation.Type:journal articleJournal:Management ScienceVolume:forthcoming - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Through the looking glass: tying performance and materiality to corporate purpose(2022); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Through the looking glass: tying performance and materiality to corporate purposeBy making use of the purpose definition set out by the British Academy’s Future of the Corporation programme we argue that performance relates to purpose in two dimensions. Firstly, purpose sets the frame of long-term success and defines materiality for an organisation both from a single and from a double materiality perspective. Secondly, performance in relation to purpose needs to measure profitability net of negative externalities. We review and discuss the current landscape of non-financial reporting and measurement frameworks on how they lend themselves to the determination of materiality on the one hand and to the accounting of externalities on the other hand, in order to achieve an approximation of performance in relation to purpose. We conclude by discussing how materiality and measurement viewed through a purpose-lens could help an advanced understanding of performance in practice for sustainable finance, corporate governance and management decision-making.Type:journal articleJournal:Journal of the British AcademyIssue:10(5) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Measuring Purpose: An Integrated Framework(2021) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Board’s Role in Sustainability(Harvard Business Review, 2020)