Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Effects of Patents versus R&D Subsidies on Income Inequality
    (ScienceDirect, 2018-07)
    Chu, Angus
    ;
    This study explores the effects of patent protection and R&D subsidies on innovation and income inequality using a Schumpeterian growth model with heterogeneous households. We find that although strengthening patent protection and raising R&D subsidies have the same macroeconomic effects of stimulating innovation and economic growth, they have drastically different microeconomic implications on income inequality. Specifically, strengthening patent protection increases income inequality whereas raising R&D subsidies decreases (increases) it if the quality step size is sufficiently small (large). An empirically realistic quality step size is smaller than the threshold, implying a negative effect of R&D subsidies on income inequality. We also calibrate the model to provide a quantitative analysis and find that strengthening patent protection causes a moderate increase in income inequality and a negligible increase in consumption inequality whereas raising R&D subsidies causes a relatively large decrease in both income inequality and consumption inequality.
    Type:
    Journal:
    Volume:
    Scopus© Citations 75
  • Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Effects of economic development in China on skill-biased technical change in the US
    (Elsevier, 2015-04)
    Chu, Angus
    ;
    Furukawa, Yuichi
    ;
    In this study, we explore the effects of a change in unskilled labor in China on the direction of innovation in the US by incorporating production offshoring into a North-South model of directed technical change. We find that intellectual property rights (IPRs) and offshoring are different ways for the labor endowment of the South to affect the size of the market for innovations in the North. Absent offshoring and lacking IPRs in the South - as in China in the early 1980s - an increase in Southern unskilled labor should lead to skill-biased technical change. If instead offshoring is present and/or IPRs are better enforced (as in China in more recent times), then a decrease in unskilled labor in the South should lead to skill-biased technical change. Furthermore, an increase in Southern per capita stock of capital reduces offshoring and also leads to skill-biased technical change. Calibrating the model to China-US data, we find that under a moderate elasticity of substitution between skill-intensive and labor-intensive goods, the decrease in unskilled labor and the increase in capital in China can explain about one-third of the recent increase in the skill premium in China through skill-biased technical change in the US.
    Type:
    Journal:
    Volume:
  • Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Endogenous fertility and human capital in a Schumpeterian growth model
    (Springer Science, 2013-01-11) ;
    Chu, Angus
    ;
    Liao, Chih-Hsing
    This study develops a scale-invariant Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous fertility and human capital accumulation. The model features two engines of long-run economic growth: R&D-based innovation and human capital accumulation. One novelty of this study is endogenous fertility, which negatively affects the growth rate of human capital. Given this growth-theoretic framework, we characterize the dynamics of the model and derive comparative statics of the equilibrium growth rates with respect to structural parameters. As for policy implications, we analyze how patent policy affects economic growth through technological progress, human capital accumulation, and endogenous fertility. In summary, we find that strengthening patent protection has (a) a positive effect on technological progress, (b) a negative effect on human capital accumulation through a higher rate of fertility, and (c) an ambiguous overall effect on economic growth.
    Type:
    Journal:
    Volume:
    Issue:
    Scopus© Citations 49
  • Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation?
    (Elsevier, 2012-05) ;
    Chu, Angus
    ;
    Galli, Silvia
    This study develops an R&D-based growth model with vertical and horizontal innovation to shed some light on the current debate on whether patent protection stimulates or stifles innovation. We analyze the effects of patent protection in the form of blocking patents. We show that patent protection changes the direction of innovation by having asymmetric effects on vertical innovation (i.e., quality improvement) and horizontal innovation (i.e., variety expansion). Calibrating the model and simulating transition dynamics, we find that strengthening the effect of blocking patents stifles vertical innovation and decreases economic growth but increases social welfare due to an increase in horizontal innovation. In light of this finding, we argue that in order to properly analyze the growth and welfare implications of patents, it is important to consider their often neglected compositional effects on vertical and horizontal innovation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Type:
    Journal:
    Volume:
    Issue:
    Scopus© Citations 82