Thomas Beschorner
Title
Prof. Dr.
Last Name
Beschorner
First name
Thomas
Email
thomas.beschorner@unisg.ch
ORCID
Phone
+41 71 224 3143
Web Site
316 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 316
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Responsibility of Foreign Companies in Aggressor States: A reply-reply to Brühl(2026-05-29) ;Markus Scholz ;Peter SeeleType:journal articleJournal:Business Ethics Journal ReviewVolume:13Issue:2DOI:10.12747/j1m03 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, BWL, Glaube, Praxis(theorie)(2026-03-07)Type:journal articleJournal:Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und UnternehmensethikVolume:27Issue:1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Cultural Business Ethics: A Multilevel Theory(2025-03-14)While 'culture' is an omnipresent notion in management, economics, and business ethics, it is often used in the sense of "climate" (Denison 1996). In this contribution, we approach culture in a different manner while emphasizing a methodological cultural perspective. We will first outline a general cultural approach in a Weberian tradition that focuses on five crucial levels of analysis: elements of a theory of action, social relations, institutions, organizations, and system theories. Based on that, we will sketch selected considerations by identifying elements of organizational ethics, business and society relations, and societal systems perspectives. This will allow us to outline a broad spectrum of conceptual considerations by introducing concepts such as moral (bounded) rationality, multi-rational and poly-lingual organizations, the ethics of organizational fields, and systemic responsibility. Finally, we sketch some directions for further research, which not only concerns social-science approaches but also offers some suggestions for bridging our approach with normative business ethics.Type:journal articleJournal:ORDO - Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und GesellschaftVolume:74 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Wirtschaftsphilosophie 4-3-2-1: Vier Felder (Matrix), drei Fragen, zwei Hinweise, eine Bemerkung(2024-09-16)Type:journal articleJournal:Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik (zfwu)Volume:2024Issue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Digital Freedom: Opening Up the DebateThis paper contributes to the normative analysis of digital technologies and data-driven practices by broadening the analytical perspective on freedom. Many contemporary discussions of the digital context tend to operate with a relatively narrow conception of freedom, which centers on the absence of interference. While this approach is in line with liberalism’s on-going paradigmatic standing in much of the Western world, we argue that digital theorists have much to gain from opening their discussions to social and positive conceptions of freedom. Drawing on the work of Axel Honneth and John Christman, we show how such a change in perspective gives rise to new considerations for freedom in the digital context, such as collective self-determination, capabilities, and mutual recognition. Building on these ideas, we sketch three demands that follow from such an inclusive conception of freedom: empowering people via new forms of political participation, increasing diversity and collective awareness in the digital industry, as well as using progressive political regulation to unleash digital technology’s social potential.Type:journal articleJournal:Morals & MachinesVolume:2Issue:1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Kulturalistische (Wirtschafts)Ethik. Grundlagen eines Forschungsprogramms(Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 2021-12-20); ;Hübscher, MarcKettner, MatthiasType:journal articleJournal:Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und UnternehmensethikVolume:22Issue:3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Kulturalistische (Wirtschafts-)Ethik im Resonanzraum (Replik-Replik)(Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 2021-12-20); ;Hübscher, MarcKettner, MatthiasType:journal articleJournal:Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und UnternehmensethikVolume:22Issue:3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Triage 4.0: On Death Algorithms and Technological Selection. Is Today’s Data- Driven Medical System Still Compatible with the Constitution?(2021-11-17) ;Helbing, DirkHealth data bear great promises for a healthier and happier life, but they also make us vulnerable. Making use of millions or billions of data points, Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are now creating new benefits. For sure, harvesting Big Data can have great potentials for the health system, too. It can support accurate diagnoses, better treatments and greater cost effectiveness. However, it can also have undesirable implications, often in the sense of undesired side effects, which may in fact be terrible. Examples for this, as discussed in this article, are discrimination, the mechanisation of death, and genetic, social, behavioural or technological selection, which may imply eugenic effects or social Darwinism. As many unintended effects become visible only after years, we still lack sufficient criteria, long-term experience and advanced methods to reliably exclude that things may go terribly wrong. Handing over decision-making, responsibility or control to machines, could be dangerous and irresponsible. It would also be in serious conflict with human rights and our constitution.Type:journal articleJournal:Journal of European CMEVolume:10Issue:1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Algorithms, Decision-making, and the Human Outside the Code(2021-12-18); In this intervention, we discuss to what extent the term “decision” serves as an adequate terminology for what algorithms actually do. Although calculations of algorithms might be perceived as or be an important basis for a decision, we argue, that this terminology is not only misleading but also problematic. A calculation is not a decision, we claim, since a decision (implicitly) includes two important aspects: imaginaries about the future and a “fictional surplus” as well as the process of justification. Our proposal can be seen as an invitation to reflect but the role of “humans outside the code” (and not merely “in the loop”).Type:journal articleJournal:Moral & MachinesVolume:1Issue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Ehrbare Kaufleute: sympathisch, aber viel zu brav!Type:journal articleJournal:Audit Committee QuarterlyIssue:1