Stefan T. Siegel
Title
Dr.
Last Name
Siegel
First name
Stefan T.
Email
stefan.siegel@unisg.ch
ORCID
Phone
+41 71 224 7591
Web Site
228 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 228
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Worauf kommt es wirklich an? Eine explorative Studie zu Feedback in der zweiten Phase der Lehrerbildung(Verlag Empirische Pädagogik) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Systems thinking among students in sustainability programs(2026-07) - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Buzzwords und Mythen in der PädagogikIn education, arguments are often made using buzzwords that sound trendy and catchy, not least because they are repeated so often, but on closer inspection remain vague. This harbors dangers that we should be aware of.Type:journal articleJournal:PÄDAGOGIKVolume:76Issue:1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Educational Myths Debunked. Insights into the Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Course for University FacultyThis article discusses Educational Myths Debunked 101 (EMD101), a further education course designed to help university faculty identify, analyze, and debunk myths about teaching and learning in higher education. Based on educational psychological findings, EMD101 covers the theoretical basics such as characteristics, causes, consequences, and handling of educational myths. Through an emancipatory, transfer-oriented, and reflective approach the course enables instructors to critically evaluate potential questionable teaching beliefs and practices in higher education. The paper details the course objectives, content, and includes a critical review of its strengths and weaknesses, suggesting areas for future improvement.Type:journal articleJournal:Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung (Journal for Higher Education Development)Volume:20Issue:1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, “We don’t need no thought control”: dealing with faculty members spreading conspiracy theoriesRecent studies reveal that a significant proportion of the population in various countries endorses at least some form of conspiracy theory (CT). Notably, there have been instances of faculty members spreading CTs, despite their pedagogical obligations to foster academic and scientific thinking. While the existing literature has predominantly focused on student populations, an examination of less-studied cohorts such as faculty members seems necessary. This theoretical article delves into the prevalence, underlying factors, and ramifications of CTs within the context of higher education. The present analytic article distinguishes CTs from scientific theories, elucidates the detrimental consequences for individuals and the broader society engendered by the uncritical propagation of CTs, and scrutinizes the responsibilities of students and faculty in mitigating the dissemination of misinformation. Moreover, the article posits potential solutions from both student and faculty standpoints to counteract the proliferation of CTs in higher education.Type:journal articleJournal:Higher Education - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Reimagining Teaching Portfolios Through Personal Knowledge Management with Digital Tools for Thought(2025-10-08); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Eine qualitative Bewertung der Stärken und Schwächen deutschsprachiger Erklärvideos im Pflegebereich(2024-06); - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Wissensmanagement von Lehrenden mit „Digital Tools for Thought“: Potenziale, Grenzen und EinsatzmöglichkeitenType:journal articleJournal:Neues Handbuch Hochschullehre (NHHL)Issue:114 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Fine art of Detecting Sciencewashing: Definition, Consequences, Forms & Prevention(2023); Sciencewashing is a deliberate action to simulate scientific practices or quality assurance to deceive others. It occurs in various areas, e.g., the beauty marketing or the nutritional supplement industry. In this guest article, Stefan T. Siegel and Jannes Terdenge elaborate on the question of what sciencewashing is and why it can be a challenge for science communication.Type:journal articleJournal:Journal Trends und Themen aus der Wissenschaftskommunikation - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Selbstanzeige: Erziehungswissenschaftliche Theorien und Individuelle Orofessionalisierung: Studien zu theoriebezogenen Einstellungen und Überzeugungen von Studierenden und Dozierenden erziehungswissenschaftlicher und lehramtsbezogener Studiengänge, Bad Heilbrunn (Klinkhardt Verlag) 2022, zugl.: Augsburger Univ. Diss. 2021Type:journal articleJournal:Pädagogische RundschauVolume:76Issue:4