Annika Kaltenhauser
Last Name
Kaltenhauser
First name
Annika
Email
annika.kaltenhauser@unisg.ch
Phone
071 224 2604
7 results
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, CHI’s Greatest Hits: Analyzing the 100 Most-Cited Papers in 43 Years of Research at ACM CHI(Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2025-01); ; ; Type:journal articleJournal:InteractionsVolume:32Issue:1DOI:10.1145/3704804Scopus© Citations 5 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Meta-HCI: Practising Reflection in HCI Research(2026-04-13); ;Arnera, James ;Unger, Amelie ;Ppali, SophiaVan Berkel NielsReflection is recognised as vital for rigorous and responsible (HCI) research, yet it is often treated as secondary, hidden in the margins of papers. This meet-up invites CHI attendees to come together in the META HCI community to explore how we as researchers and practitioners reflect on our own practices-and how we might do so more intentionally. Over 90 minutes, the session will provide a lively, informal forum for sharing experiences, surfacing challenges, and discussing the role of reflection in HCI. By fostering candid conversations about ourselves, our practices, and the structures that shape the field, the meet-up offers an opportunity for collective self-examination and connection across subfields, laying the groundwork for an enduring community of reflective practice.Type:conference paper - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, "Yes I Am Reflecting on Reflecting!" – Mapping Understandings, Practices, and Challenges in HCI Research Practices(2026-10); ;Osipova, MargaritaArnera, JamesReflection has long been discussed as a critical component of rigorous and ethical research in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). However, despite its sustained prominence in methodological discourse, little is known about how HCI researchers understand and practise reflection. To address this gap, we conducted a survey with 85 researchers across diverse HCI subfields, inviting them to reflect on their reflective practices. We identified a diversity of meanings attributed to reflection, the contexts in which researchers engage in it, and the institutional, disciplinary, and personal factors that shape these practices. Participants reported different practices, including team discussions, peer feedback and informal reflection, yet also many barriers to consistency, such as time constraints, lack of institutional recognition, and emotional or cognitive overload. Our analysis surfaces tensions between aspirations for meaningful reflection and dominant norms of productivity, objectivity, and publishability. Our paper offers a meta-scientific mapping of reflection in HCI, along with constructive ambitions to foster a more reflective research culture.Type:conference paper - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Playing with Perspectives and Unveiling the Autoethnographic Kaleidoscope in HCI – A Literature Review of AutoethnographiesAutoethnography is a valuable methodological approach bridging the gap between personal experiences and academic inquiry, enabling researchers to gain deep insights into various dimensions of technology use and design. While its adoption in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) continues to grow, a comprehensive investigation of its function and role within HCI research is still lacking. This paper examines the evolving landscape of autoethnographies within HCI over the past two decades through a systematic literature review. We identify prevalent themes, methodologies, and contributions emerging from autoethnographies by analysing a corpus of 31 HCI publications. Furthermore, we detail data collection techniques and analysis methods and describe reporting standards. Our literature review aims to inform future (HCI) researchers, practitioners, and designers. It encourages them to embrace autoethnography's rich opportunities by providing examples across domains (e.g., embodiment or health and wellbeing) to advance our understanding of the complex relationships between humans and technology.Type:conference paperScopus© Citations 59 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The churns and turns of HCI: Which CHI papers make the most impact in an ever-growing sea of HCI publications?(2025-04-30); ; ;Elizabeth F. Churchill ;Ishii, HiroshiElisa D. MaklerOver the years, the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) has grown and expanded its scope to influence many diverse domains. As the premier venue for HCI research, the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) has played a pivotal role with over 11,000 full papers published and nearly one million citations collectively accrued and regularly accessed by all computing science disciplines who have access to the ACM digital library. Throughout HCI's evolution, specific areas—such as usability, interaction design, accessibility, and user-centred design methodologies have had a demonstrable and sustained impact, succeeding in the overall goal of improving human experiences with technology. This panel will engage the CHI community in critically reflecting on the evolving meaning of impact in HCI in the face of new technological landscapes.Type:conference contributionJournal:CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsScopus© Citations 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Alt Text and Alt Sense in VR: Engaging Screen Reader Users within the Metaverse Through Multisenses(2023-03); ;Stellmacher, Carolin; ;Wagener, NadineNeumann, DanielType:conference speech