Thomas Yibai Li
Last Name
Li
First name
Thomas Yibai
Email
thomas.li@unisg.ch
4 results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, No Feeling for the Future: Re-examining the Role of Emotions and Cognition in Forecasting(2026-04-28)Our study set out to build on Pham et al.'s (2012) "emotional oracle effect," which claimed that one's trust-in-feelings (TIF) enhances forecasting accuracy by unlocking tacit knowledge. Inspired by this interesting finding, we aimed to explore how one's TIF interacts with crystallized intelligence (CI) and fluid intelligence (FI) to strengthen our understanding of the interplay between emotions and cognition when making predictions. However, a surprising discovery reshaped our investigation: the foundational TIF mechanism itself failed to replicate. Across two robust studies (N = 226; confirmation study N = 432), TIF showed negligible and inconsistent direct effect on prediction accuracy, challenging the theory's core premise. While marginally significant, results suggest TIF might improve accuracy for individuals with high CI; these effects were limited and contingent on specific contexts. Our findings undermine the generalizability of the emotional oracle effect and highlight the fragility of its theoretical foundation. The results present a cautionary tale about building on and extending theories without first thoroughly validating core mechanisms.Type:journal article - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Patches and Payoffs: A Pilot Study of Information Foraging and Forecasting Accuracy on Cultivate(2026-04-28)How people use Cultivate can predict how well they forecast. Using webcam eye and screen-tracking (7 participants, 44 sessions, approx. 1612 mins) on the online forecasting platform, Cultivate, we compared the top forecasters to other groups. Three effective forecasting behaviors emerged: 1) time-allocation, top forecasters spent a smaller proportion of time on-platform (64% vs. 71-86%) and avoided overinvesting in crowd rationales (14% vs. 23-54%); 2) execution, when they did log in, they were productive (1.5 forecast updates per session vs. <0.86); and 3) calibration, they made smaller adjustments (6% vs. 8-14%). Lower performers showed two potential traps: excessive forecast formulation and rumination, as well as endless crowd rationale engagement without further investigation. Our findings from the pilot study show that platform engagement does not necessarily translate to better forecasters; selective, integrative foraging does. We propose platform tweaks, including varied visual hierarchy, decay of scent for over-visited areas, re-entry and exit prompts, and "update assistants" to nudge advantageous behaviors.Type:journal article - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Sad But Accurate? Examining the Role of Discrete Emotions on Prediction Performance(2026-04-28)How do discrete emotions influence prediction accuracy? Drawing on appraisal-tendency framework and approach-avoidance models, we hypothesized that approach-oriented emotions with high certainty (anger, happiness) would enhance prediction accuracy through heuristic processing, while avoidance-oriented emotions with low certainty appraisals (fear, sadness) would trigger over-deliberation and impair performance. We further tested whether trust-in-feelings (TIF) moderates these relationships. Participants (N = 740) underwent emotion induction and TIF manipulation (high vs. none) before making predictions about weather, movie box office performance and stock market movements. Results contradicted predictions: fear and sadness improved weather prediction accuracy (ORs = 1.67-2.28), performing comparably to anger and happiness. Effects were domainspecific, emerging only for weather. TIF showed minimal effects (one of seven predictions reached significance), representing a failure to replicate Pham et al.'s (2012) "emotional oracle effect". These findings challenge assumptions about negative emotions in forecasting and suggest emotional engagement - rather than discrete emotions or TIF - drives accuracy.Type:journal article - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, A Feeling Beyond Cognition: Can Certain Emotions Help Increase Prediction Accuracy of the Future?Much of the focus on increasing prediction accuracy of future events has been placed on improving cognition. While cognition is important, the current study is expected to show that affective factors contribute significantly to the precision of these future forecasts. Specifically, emotions characterized by either certainty appraisals or uncertainty appraisals are expected to create differing impact on the forecasting accuracy of five different future events across various domains (e.g., politics, weather, stock market performance). Certainty-charged emotions will increase prediction accuracy due to an increased focus on heuristic processing, whereas uncertainty-charged emotions will decrease prediction accuracy due to an overreliance on systematic processing. Although counter-intuitive, prior research has shown a similar mechanism that led to these expected results.Type:conference paper