Carina Ulrika Gröner
Title
Dr. phil.
Last Name
Gröner
First name
Carina Ulrika
Email
carina.groener@unisg.ch
ORCID
Phone
+41 71 224 2438
44 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 44
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Schreiben als Erfolgsgeschichte(2025-03-07) ;Christina Hollosi-BoigerType:journal articleJournal:JoSch - Journal für Schreibwissenschaft - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Schreiben als Erfolgsgeschichte. Feedforward als Methodik in der SchreibberatungType:journal articleJournal:JoSch - Journal für SchreibwissenschaftVolume:15/28Issue:Textfeedback in Praxis und Forschung, Teil IIDOI:10.3278/JOS2403W - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Das geht doch auch alles online, oder? Chancen und Herausforderungen von Online-Events zur Schreibberatung – „Schreibnacht“ und „Zitiertag online“(2022-09)The experiences gained from online teaching 2020 and 2021 have led to the rapid development of many online formats. Using the example of the University of St. Gallen, this article examines the opportunities and challenges of online events for academic writing. Based on two examples, the „Night of Writing Skills“ and the innovative „Citation Day“, an event especially designed for online citation support, this article examines these academic writing events as parts of new learning environments and a modern and contemporary design of teaching.Type:journal articleJournal:e-beratungsjournal.net – Zeitschrift für Online-Beratung und computervermittelte KommunikationVolume:18Issue:2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, English as a Lingua Franca for academic writing in Switzerland:
insights from the University of St. Gallen(ETAS English Teachers Association, Switzerland, 2020); ;Kyburz, MarkThis article offers insights into second-language academic writing based on the practical experiences gained at the Academic Writing Centre of the University of St. Gallen. The number of consultations, as well as the questions and issues raised, show that students writing in English as a second language seek advice more often than those writing in their first language. Interestingly, these questions concern not only language but also what producing written academic English means in terms of the writing process.Type:journal articleJournal:ETAS JournalVolume:37Issue:3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Wissenschaftlich argumentieren und zitierenCitation questions often include questions about argumentation and academic integrity. What are important features of academic argumentation and how should citations be used correctly in academic argumentation? How are academic integrity, argumentation and citation stadards related? This book tries to answer these and other questions about academic argumentation and citations and shall serve as a guiadance for students and lecturers.Type:book - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Textgewebe. Goethes Erzähler in den Wilhelm-Meister-RomanenJohann Wolfgang Goethe spent more than sixty years working on different parts of his Wilhelm Meister novels and they can be seen as the core of his narrative work. Based on Gérard Genette's narratological approach, Carina Gröner shows that textiles not only play an essential role in these texts in terms of conten, but that the poetological structure of these novels is structured like a textile fabric and can be described using common textile metaphors like “weave” and “work” whereby “work” has both a textile-technical and a reception-aesthetic meaning.Type:book - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Unlocking Multilingualism: Thoughts Shaped by Tools?(2026); ;Zanina, Anna ;Coman, Adela ;Vasilace, SimonaMoallem, AbbasThis paper analyses how the persuasive form of AI-generated editing suggestions for language and style in academic writing can manipulate the usage of AI-tools from supporting learning processes to outsourcing sub-tasks - especially for multilingual writers. In a qualitative analysis comparing an undergraduate student draft introduction with a fully AI-generated and two AI-edited versions (one where AI-editing has a dominator function, i.e. there are no explanations and the user only needs to control the output and one with an operator function, with marked changes and explanations also supporting critical evaluation and learning processes). The results show that AI-editing as dominator produces a larger number of changes compared to AI-editing as operator, and these changes also affect content and meaning. Together with the persuasive phrasing of AI outputs and the writers’ expectation of efficiency, this contributes to support an uncritical way of usage. This can be problematic for undergraduate multilingual writers in particular, as they still lack the language skills and knowledge about academic writing conventions to be able to critically evaluate the AI-suggested output they are responsible for. In addition to that, the comparison also shows that changes through AI-editing stay on the language surface. Argumentation-related effects or errors indicating the learning level like mentioning academic titles of authors or very generalized method descriptions stay unchanged in the AI-editing process. These errors can serve as valuable indicators to discriminate AI-edited from fully AI-generated texts especially at undergraduate level.Type:book sectionJournal:HCI International 2025 – Late Breaking Papers 27th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2025 Gothenburg, Sweden, June 22–27, 2025 Proceedings, Part VII - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Secret Power of Syntax: Improving ChatGPT Translation Quality Through Sentence Constituent Analysis?(Springer Nature (Switzerland), 2025-05) ;Anna Zanina-Seck; ;Degen, HelmutNtoa, StavroulaThe synergy between AI efficiency and human expertise can result in high-quality translations that benefit a wide range of applications, from aca-demic writing and administrative texts to legal documents. Human translators employ a variety of strategies based on their expertise and understanding of both the source and target languages. This paper uses an explorative setting to inves-tigate the potential of CoT prompting including steps of linguistic analysis, like phrase structure analysis and sentence constituent analysis for English to German translations of text passages containing complex noun phrases. Text passages of academic, administrative and law texts containing complex noun phrases were translated by ChatGPT using a zero-shot one question prompt first and a Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompt including steps of linguistic analysis second. To evaluate translation quality, we compared ChatGPT translations with authorized transla-tions of the sample texts. The results show that CoT prompting could dissolve syntactic ambiguities caused by complex noun phrases. In addition to that, the model’s documentation of phrase structure analysis displayed that ChatGPT cor-rectly figured out the noun phrases’ heads in the sample texts. However, ChatGPT translations contain critical mistakes in every example that impair translation qual-ity and underline the unconditional need for human oversight and correction by expert translators. Despite its strong advancements, ChatGPT-4 does not replicate the intuitive reasoning capabilities of human linguistic experts.Type:book sectionJournal:6th International Conference, AI-HCI 2025 Held as Part of the 27th HCI International Conference, HCII 2025 Gothenburg, Sweden, June 22–27, 2025Volume:Proceedings, Part III